Little_Princess_2012

💜💜I'm curious what players of different abilities have to say.🤗 Personally I've found Karpov the most enjoyable overall to study and replay his games.😏

I've tried Kasparov as well, and while they are always super exciting his games definitely have 🌹a feeling of being somewhat out of reach. Karpov is probably easier to appreciate from a strategic standpoint, although maybe I just like the way he plays better.😋

Surprisingly, 💐I don't think I've got much out of replaying Fischer's games. I haven't reviewed that many, so🙂🙂 perhaps I just need to dig deeper.

I wonder if this is just a matter of style? 🌼🌼Would like to hear from anyone and everyone. Which do you study and why?💜💜

Thanks💌

✋🖐work is the prime example of a classic chess book. It has consistently remained in the top five best-selling chess books of all time, and has been a recommendation of grandmasters and trainers since 1925! This was one of the first works to be considered a handbook for positional chess, and it does a great job of introducing very important positional ideas (e.g. prophylaxis, pawn chains, blockading passed pawns, utilizing the center, etc.).

My System is aimed at a stronger target audience (1500-2200 strength), and some feel that it reads like a textbook (some people prefer this method for learning). Despite not being considered as accessible as other classics, this book is a must-own for any serious player. 👍👍👍

🌍🌎🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌

Chess is not just a game, it's a strong competition where the top players battle it out to see who is the best. In this world of strategy and skill, the top players have worked hard to reach the highest levels of this challenging game. Choosing the best player ever in any sport is a matter of personal opinion, and there are many factors that can’t be measured.